Quality of the Rule of Law and Institutional Change: Electoral Reform vs. Judicial Reform in Mexico and Chile
PDF (Español (España))

Supplementary Files

Calidad del Estado de Derecho y cambio institucional: reforma judicial vs. reforma electoral en México y Chile (Español (España))

Keywords

Quality of Democracy
quality of the Rule of Law
rule of Law in Mexico
rule of Law in Chile
institutional change in Mexico
institu-tional change in Chile

How to Cite

Gómez, A. (2016). Quality of the Rule of Law and Institutional Change: Electoral Reform vs. Judicial Reform in Mexico and Chile. Polis, 12(1), 85–109. Retrieved from https://polismexico.izt.uam.mx/index.php/rp/article/view/542

Abstract

This article tries to help to explain the differences in the quality of the rule of law between Mexico and Chile beginning with its institutional evolution along the 90s and 2000 decades. Analyzing the sequence, the context and the strategies of the institutional change, it shows that while in Chile the judicial reforms was privileged over the electoral ones, in Mexico happened the contrary. The study suggest that a sequence of institutional change that during the transition and the firsts democratic governments put the accent in the electoral reforms over the those related with the rule of law, in the long run results unfavorable to the quality of the latest.

PDF (Español (España))

References

Barreda, Mikel (2011), “La calidad de la democracia. Un análisis comparado de América Latina”, Política y Gobierno, 18(2), pp. 265-296.

Bates, Robert H. et al. (1998), "Analytic narratives", Princeton University Press.

Castillejos Aragón, Mónica (2013), “The transformation of the Mexican Supreme Court”, en Kapiszeuski, Silverstein y Kagan, Consequential Courts: Juudicial Roles in Global Perspective, Cambridge University Press.

Domingo, Pilar (2004), “Judicialization of politics or politicization of the judiciary? Recent trends in Latin America”, Democratization, 2(1), pp. 104-126.

Duce, J. Mauricio (2004), “La reforma procesal penal en Chile: gestación y estado de avance de un proceso de transformación en marcha”, en Luis Pásara (comp.), En busca de una justicia distinta: experiencias de reforma en América Latina”, México, UNAM-IIJ.

Eisanstadt, Todd (2006), “Mexico’s postectoral concertaceciones: the rise and demise of a substitutive informal institution”, en Helmke y Levitsky (eds.), Informal Institutions and Democracy, Baltimore, Then Johns Hopkins University Press.

Fix Fierro, Héctor (2004), “La reforma en México: entre la eficacia autoritaria y la incertidumbre democrática”, en Luis Pásara (comp.), En busca de una justicia distinta: experiencias de reforma en América Latina”, México, UNAM-IIJ.

Garretón, Manuel Antonio (1989), "La posibilidad democrática en Chile", Santiago, FLACSO (Cuadernos de Difusión).

Garretón, Manuel Antonio (2002), “La (in)conducción política del segundo gobierno democrático”, en Muñoz y Stefoni (coords.), El Periodo del presidente Frei Ruiz-Tagle, Santiago, FLACSO-Editorial Universitaria.

Garoupa, Nino y Tom Ginsbourg (2008), “Guarding the guardians: judicial councils and judicial independence”, U. of Chicago Law and Economics, Olin Working Paper 444.

Hagopian, Frances (2005), “Derechos, representación y la creciente calidad de la democracia en Brasil y Chile”, Política y Gobierno, 12(1), pp. 41-90.

Holzner, Claudio (2011), “Mexico: weak state, weak democracy”, en Levine y Molina (eds.), The quality of democracy in Latin America, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publiser.

Levine y Molina (2011), “Evaluating the quality of democracy in Latin America”, en Levine y Molina (eds.), The quality of democracy in Latin

America, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publiser.

Linz y Stepan (1996), "Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe", Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Mahoney, James y Kathleen Thelen (2010), “A theory of gradual institutional change”, en Mahoney y Thelen (eds.), Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency and power, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Magaloni, Beatriz (2003), “Authoritarianism, democracy and the Supreme Court: horizontal exchange and the rule of law in Mexico”, en

Mainwaring y Welna, Democratic accountability in Latin America, Nueva York, Oxford University Press.

Mazzuca, Sebastián (2010), “Access to power vs. exercise of power. Reconceptualizing the quality of democracy in Latin America”, Springer Science Business Media.

Molinar, Juan (1998), “Renegociación de las reglas del juego: el Estado y los partidos políticos” en Serrano y Bulmer-Thomas, La reconstrucción del Estado: México después de Salinas, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Morlino, Leonardo (2013), "What Qualities of Democracy in Latin America? A Report for idea", San José, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.

Ostrom, Elinor (1986), “An agenda for the study of institutions”, Public Choice, 48, pp. 3-25

Pierson, Paul y Theda Skocpol (2008), “El institucionalismo histórico en la ciencia política contemporánea”, Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 17(1), pp. 7-38.

Rojas Aravena, Francisco (2002), “Introducción”, en Muñoz y Stefoni (coords.), El Periodo del presidente Frei Ruiz-Tagle, Santiago, FLACSO-Editorial Universitaria.

Ríos Figueroa, Julio (2007), “Fragmentation of power and the emergence of an effective judiciary in Mexico, 1994-2002”, Latin American Politics and Society, 49(1), pp. 39-57.

Ruiz, Leticia (2011), “Chile: a model case?” En Levine y Molina (eds), The quality of democracy in Latin America, Boulder, Lynne Rienner.

Schmitter, Phillipe (2003), “The quality of democracy: the ambiguous virtues of accountability”, Istituto Universitario Europeo.

Schmitter y Santiso (1998), “Three temporal dimensions of the consolidation of democracy”, IPSR, 19(1), pp. 69-92.

Scribner, Druscilla L (2013), “Distributing Political Power: The Constitutional Tribunal in Post-Authoritarian Chile”, en Kapiszeuski, Silverstein y Kagan, Consequential Courts: Juudicial Roles in Global Perspective, Cambridge University Press.

Sehnbruch y Siavelis (eds.) (2013), "Democratic Chile: the politics and policies of a historic coalition, 1990-2010", Boulder, Lynne Rienner, 2013.

Schatz, Sara (2000), “The political context: nullifying the punitive Court´s legal formal rulings and the attempt to continue the reign of informal, case-by-case justice”, en Masses and the struggle for democracy in Mexico: a cultural approach, Westport, Praeger.

Thelen, Kathleen (1999), “Historical institutionalism in comparative politics”, Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., vol. 2, Concordia University, pp. 369-404.

Thelen, Kathleen (2002), “The Explanatory Power of Historical Institutionalism” en Renate Mayntz (ed.), Akteure, Mechanismen, Modelle. Zur Theoriefähigkeit makro-sozialer Analysen, Fráncfort, Campus Verlag.

Thelen, Kathleen (2006), “The evolution of vocational training in Germany”, en Saphiro, Skowronek y Galvin (eds.), Rethinking political institutions: the art of the State, Nueva York, New York University Press.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.